In my experience, people learn best by "doing". Of course, in order to "do" something, one must know the underlying concepts, and sometimes those need to be presented in a more traditional manner. However, I don't feel that simply lecture or reading is enough to make the learning permanent. In order to have a complete understanding, one must show that they can apply the knowledge in authentic ways. I will admit that there have been times when I received a wonderful grade on an assignment or test, but had I been asked to perform a task based on the information, I would have failed. I never had an adequate understanding to be able to apply what I learned.
I feel that Constructivism is probably the theory that best fits my ideas about how people learn. I believe that when students are given "real world" problems to solve or tasks to complete that are meaningful to them, they will have a much better understanding and will retain the information. I love that the teacher is supposed to be a facilitator in a Constructivist classroom, using guiding questions and discussions to help students arrive at the answers. In looking for additional information about Constructivism, I found this list of traits of a Constructivist teacher:
- Constructivist teachers encourage and accept student autonomy and initiative.
- Constructivist teachers use raw data and primary sources along with manipulative, interactive, and physical materials.
- Constructivist teachers use cognitive terminology such as "classify," "analyze," "predict," and "create" when framing tasks.
- Constructivist teachers allow student responses to drive lessons, shift instructional strategies, and alter content.
- Constructivist teachers inquire about students' understandings of concepts before sharing their own understandings of those concepts.
- Constructivist teachers encourage students to engage in dialogue both with the teacher and with one another.
- Constructivist teachers encourage student inquiry by asking thoughtful, open-ended questions and encouraging students to ask questions of each other.
- Constructivist teachers seek elaboration of students' initial responses.
- Constructivist teachers engage students in experiences that might engender contradictions to their initial hypotheses and then encourage discussion.
- Constructivist teachers allow a waiting time after posing questions.
- Constructivist teachers provide time for students to construct relationships and create metaphors.
- Constructivist teachers nurture students' natural curiosity through frequent use of the learning cycle model (Brooks & Brooks, 1993).
I also feel it is necessary to remember Gardner's Multiple Intelligences theory. We all know people that "get it" just by hearing a lecture. Sometimes people are great at remembering things they see, while others need to get "hands-on" experience in order to master a concept. Some people learn through debate and discussion. I believe, that in the field of Instructional Design and Technology, it is so important to allow for ALL modes of learning.
Finally, while creating our "top ten" list, I did some research on Behaviorism as it is used in IDT. I found information that explained that one can use the theories of Behaviorism to be sure that we do instill bias or bad feelings. I think this is an important concept to keep in mind, as students can unconsciously end up learning things that we do not plan for them to learn.
4 comments:
I agree about the difference between having learned facts and being able to implement the facts. The reverse is also true. On the high school level--I had students that could make a 100 on a test but not be able to navigate in Word. And I had kids who could do everything in Word but fail the test. And with such strong emphasis on testing--sometimes the hands-on skills go sadly lacking.
I agree with you that students learn by doing. I do try to plan activities that will keep the students involved as much as I can. However, with time constraints and testing it can get frustrating. When I ask students what is their goal for the school year the majority of them say that it is to pass the EOG. The EOG is just one test and will not determine their futures as students.
In the courses that I design at my company, I always try to incorporate exercises where the students have to locate the correct information in our corporate knowledge databases, for solving "real life" situations.
I also feel that Constructivism is a good theory. I think that in time we will see more of a shift towards it. In present take teacher education classes, constructivism is emphasized. As the next gerneration of teachers graduate, it will be more apparent in the schools.
Post a Comment